Television shows centered on emergency responders have long captivated audiences, especially during the pandemic when viewers sought action-packed yet relatable escapism. From Grey’s Anatomy to Station 19, these fictional dramas offer glimpses into the lives of first responders, but they inevitably take liberties with reality.
Chicago Fire, one of the most popular entries in the genre, goes to great lengths to depict firefighting with authenticity. The show even enlists real firefighters to train the cast and ensure its portrayal of the Chicago Fire Department is as accurate as possible. However, as with any dramatization, Chicago Fire occasionally misses the mark.
How Chicago Fire Brings Realism to the Screen
One of Chicago Fire’s standout features is its commitment to authenticity. The cast undergoes training with the Chicago Fire Department, and the show even includes a real firefighter among its ranks: Tony Ferraris, who plays himself.
To enhance realism, Chicago Fire uses actual fire during filming rather than relying on CGI. Actor Charlie Bennett shared with Showbiz CheatSheet:
“I know when I’m running into most of those buildings it’s hot and there’s a real fire in front of me — it’s not CGI. All the tools are real, and that’s largely down to [executive producer] Dick Wolf; he made sure we had everything possible to make it real — the tools, the trucks, the gear, all of the people in the background are real firefighters.”
This dedication to realism extends to the props, sets, and action sequences, giving viewers an adrenaline-filled, close-to-life portrayal of firefighting.
Where the Show Falls Short
Despite its impressive efforts, Chicago Fire is still a scripted drama, which means not every element aligns with reality. One of the most noticeable inaccuracies, according to real firefighters, is the depiction of fire scenes — particularly the lack of smoke.
Former firefighter Steve “Chik” Chikerotis, who also serves as a consultant for the show, revealed to AV Club:
“[The smoke is] the only exception. The smoke is 90 percent less than in an actual incident. If you shut your eyes right now, that’s our visibility in an average fire.”
The decision to reduce smoke during filming is understandable, given the practical challenges of creating such environments for actors and crew. However, this adjustment sacrifices an important aspect of realism, as smoke plays a critical role in the dangerous and disorienting nature of real-life firefighting.
Why Fans Love Chicago Fire, Despite the Inaccuracies
Even with occasional departures from reality, Chicago Fire has earned its place as a fan favorite. The show’s compelling mix of high-stakes action and emotional storytelling keeps viewers engaged week after week. Its focus on character relationships and personal growth resonates deeply, making it more than just a series about battling flames.
Moreover, by consulting with real firefighters and incorporating authentic elements, Chicago Fire offers audiences a glimpse into the heroism and challenges of the profession. While it may not always be perfect, the show strikes a balance between entertainment and respect for the field.
The Bottom Line
Chicago Fire does a remarkable job of portraying the bravery and dedication of firefighters, even if it occasionally bends reality for dramatic purposes. Its commitment to using real fire, authentic equipment, and firefighter consultants sets it apart in the genre, even as it grapples with the limitations of producing television.
Fans can appreciate the show for what it is: a thrilling tribute to first responders, with just enough Hollywood flair to keep the flames of interest burning bright.
