Olympic gold medalist Simone Biles became the target of a viral falsehood after the death of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, as social media swirled with claims she had written a dramatic blog post mocking him. But the blog never existed, and Biles had no part in it. What unfolded instead is a case study in how artificial intelligence–generated misinformation can go viral, especially when it touches on real-life controversies from the past. Below are seven key facts that separate reality from fiction.
The blog post was entirely fabricated
No official website, platform, or blog affiliated with Simone Biles published anything about Charlie Kirk following his death. What many users encountered on Facebook and other platforms was an AI-generated article with vague, emotionally charged language—and no credible source attribution. Phrases like sending shockwaves through both the sports and political landscapes added drama but lacked substance. No author was credited, no blog link led to a legitimate site, and Biles herself has remained silent on the matter.
Facebook posts falsely linked Biles to the story
The misinformation started with a Facebook post that quickly picked up traction. It suggested that Biles had written a response to Kirk’s death, alluding to their previous clash during the Tokyo 2021 Olympics. However, trusted outlets like Reuters and the BBC found no record of such a blog post. In fact, multiple fact-checking platforms confirmed that the article making the rounds was created by artificial intelligence, not Biles.
Their past conflict fueled the rumor
The reason this particular story gained traction so quickly is rooted in the public feud between the two. In 2021, Biles pulled out of several events at the Tokyo Olympics, citing mental health concerns. At the time, Kirk criticized her harshly, calling her a sociopath and a shame to the country. That history created just enough familiarity for readers to assume the fabricated blog was real. The mix of a true past conflict with false present-day claims made the hoax feel believable.
The post lacked any credible evidence
Despite its wide circulation, the post offered no verifiable proof. There were no screenshots from Biles’ actual blog or social media accounts, and no reputable publication reported on her having written such a post. Instead, it relied on sensational language, vague commentary, and a misleading headline. Once users clicked, they were redirected to a generic AI-written piece filled with speculation.
Similar fake stories surrounded Kirk’s death
This wasn’t the only misinformation tied to Kirk’s passing. Other false claims emerged, including stories that public figures were donating to his family or organizing tributes. None of these were backed by credible sources. Kirk, 31, was killed during an appearance at Utah Valley University as part of his American Comeback tour. His death itself was a major national news story—one that became even more complicated by the wave of digital hoaxes that followed. The hoax adds to ongoing online harassment Biles has faced
Since stepping back during the Olympics in 2021, Biles has been a frequent target of online abuse. Linking her to a fabricated blog post after someone’s death only compounded that unfair scrutiny. She has not responded publicly to the viral claim, but her silence speaks volumes. Those close to the athlete know she’s focused on training, advocacy, and protecting her mental health—far from engaging in divisive online narratives.
Experts warn about mixing fact and fiction
Misinformation that combines real people and past controversies with fabricated new content spreads fast. Experts say stories like this gain traction because they exploit what audiences already believe or remember. In this case, a real past disagreement was used to frame a completely fake story. With the rise of AI-generated content, misleading posts like this may become more common, highlighting the need for stronger fact-checking and platform accountability.
The takeaway
Simone Biles never wrote a blog about Charlie Kirk, and there is no evidence that she ever intended to. The viral post was entirely AI-generated and designed to manipulate readers. As misinformation continues to evolve, this story is a reminder to verify facts and rely on trusted sources—especially in moments of public tragedy.
Rumors travel fast—especially when celebrities and political figures are involved. Lately, whispers about a supposed connection between Olympic gymnastics legend Simone Biles and conservative commentator Charlie Kirk have been making the rounds online. But here’s the truth: these claims don’t hold water.
In this article, we’ll break down seven undeniable facts that prove Simone Biles has no actual link to Charlie Kirk’s blog or his political agenda. If you’ve seen the posts circulating on social media and wondered whether there’s any truth to them, stick around. Let’s set the record straight once and for all.
Fact #1: Simone Biles Has Never Publicly Endorsed Charlie Kirk
One of the biggest claims fueling the rumor is that Simone Biles supposedly supports Charlie Kirk’s political commentary. But if you go through her verified social media accounts, interviews, and official statements, you’ll find zero evidence of such support.
Simone Biles is vocal about issues she cares about—like mental health, women’s rights, and athletic excellence—but she’s never aligned herself with Kirk’s brand of conservatism.
Fact #2: Charlie Kirk Has Never Claimed Simone Biles Supports Him
Interestingly, the rumor doesn’t come from Kirk himself. He has criticized many public figures, but there’s no record of him ever saying Simone Biles is connected to him or his blog. If the man at the center of the storm isn’t claiming it, why should we believe random viral posts?
Fact #3: The Blog Post Linking Them Is Based on Misinterpretation
The “connection” seems to stem from a misinterpreted blog post that mentioned Simone Biles in passing while discussing athletes and cultural influence. Some readers twisted this into a false narrative of partnership between Biles and Kirk. That leap is like assuming you’re best friends with a celebrity just because they liked one of your tweets—it doesn’t add up.
Fact #4: Simone Biles’ Advocacy Focuses on Mental Health, Not Politics
Biles has been open about her struggles with mental health, using her platform to encourage athletes and everyday people to prioritize their well-being. This mission doesn’t overlap with Kirk’s political blog, which primarily focuses on culture wars, elections, and conservative activism. The two are running completely different races.
Fact #5: No Credible News Outlets Report the Link
When real stories break, reputable outlets like ESPN, The New York Times, and CNN cover them. Yet, none of these media giants have published a single word about Simone Biles and Charlie Kirk being connected. That’s a big red flag that the rumor is nothing more than internet chatter.
