One of the most talked-about topics among fans and online discussions around Boston Blue isn’t just the story or characters — it’s where the show is actually filmed. From social media threads to passionate fan conversations, viewers have zeroed in on the surprising decision to shoot much of the series outside of Boston, sparking debate about authenticity, setting, and what a police drama should feel like.
Boston is more than a backdrop in a crime series — it’s a city with history, personality, and a very real identity. Yet, early footage and behind-the-scenes clips revealed that many exterior scenes were shot in Toronto, serving as stand-ins for iconic Boston locations. This didn’t sit well with some viewers, who argued that a show about Boston police should be filmed in Boston to capture the look, energy, and local flavor that give police procedurals their texture and credibility.
The reaction was immediate. Fans took to forums with posts like “Bring the show to Boston where it belongs!” and questioned why the production opted for a Canadian city instead of the real thing. The response wasn’t just about geography — it was a deeper frustration that the series might be missing an opportunity to root itself authentically in its setting.
Donnie Wahlberg — a Boston native — weighed in, acknowledging the criticism and even assuring fans that the series would soon be filming in Boston too. His willingness to address the backlash highlighted how important place and atmosphere are to the fan community.
However, the choice to film largely in Toronto wasn’t just creative — it reflected real challenges. Budget constraints and rising production costs in today’s TV landscape made shooting in Canada a financial necessity, with Wahlberg explaining that financial pressures drove the decision. This brings up a fascinating tension at the heart of modern television: Can a show remain authentic while making practical compromises?
Despite the controversy, Boston Blue continues to draw viewers, and some fans argue that the quality of storytelling and character dynamics matter more than where the cameras roll. Others feel the city’s “absence” on screen is symbolic of larger issues with the show’s identity — that by not fully embracing its setting, it may be struggling to define what sets it apart from its predecessor.
So the burning question now — one that many fans are debating — is this:
Does Boston Blue feel like Boston Blue — or just Blue Bloods in a different zip code?
Is the series ready to win over its critics and capture the soul of its new city, or will its setting controversy overshadow the story it’s trying to tell?