The internet doesn’t miss a thing—especially when it comes to the Oscars. What’s meant to be one of the most emotional segments of the night, the “In Memoriam,” has once again found itself at the center of controversy. This year, fans were quick to call out what they believe is a glaring omission: the absence of Eric Dane and James Van Der Beek.
Within minutes of the segment airing, social media platforms lit up with confusion, frustration, and even anger. Viewers questioned how two recognizable figures—both of whom have made lasting impressions on television and pop culture—could be left out of a tribute that’s supposed to honor contributions to the industry. Was it an oversight, or something more deliberate?
For many, the issue goes beyond just two names. The Oscars have long faced criticism for their selection process in the “In Memoriam” segment. Each year, debates resurface about who gets included, who doesn’t, and what criteria are being used behind the scenes. The lack of transparency only fuels speculation—and this time, it’s no different.
Some fans argue that the Academy tends to prioritize film-centric careers, potentially sidelining actors more closely associated with television. Others believe timing, industry recognition, or even internal politics might play a role. But without any official explanation, these remain theories—leaving room for frustration to grow.
What makes this situation particularly heated is the emotional weight of the segment itself. “In Memoriam” isn’t just a list—it’s a symbolic farewell. Being left out, in the eyes of fans, can feel like a dismissal of someone’s legacy. And in an era where audiences are more vocal than ever, silence from the Academy only amplifies the backlash.
At the same time, it’s worth noting that the Oscars have, in the past, addressed omissions by updating their official online tribute lists. Whether that will happen here remains to be seen. But for now, the damage—at least in the court of public opinion—has already been done.
So, was this a simple oversight, or a deeper reflection of how the industry chooses to remember its own? Until the Academy speaks out, one thing is clear: fans aren’t letting this go anytime soon.