U.S. gymnast Simone Biles has been blasted by animal rights groups after allegedly chopping off her dog’s ears in an “excruciatingly painful” procedure, RadarOnline.com can reveal. The Olympic Golden Girl, 28, and NFL star husband Jonathan Owens, 30, recently added a fourth dog to their clan, a Doberman, and posted a snap of their new pup with its breeder on social media. However, the dog appears to have undergone a cropping procedure, which didn’t go unnoticed, sparking a flood of angry comments. And now animal welfare charity PETA has voiced its displeasure at Biles and Owens.
When Stardom Collides With Controversy
Simone Biles is no stranger to pressure. The most decorated gymnast in history has faced Olympic expectations, global scrutiny, and deeply personal battles—all under the brightest spotlight imaginable. But this time, the controversy didn’t unfold on a balance beam or competition floor. Instead, it erupted online, sparked by accusations from animal rights groups who claim the Olympic icon supported a cruel and outdated practice: dog ear cropping.
So what really happened? Did Simone Biles “chop her dog’s ears off,” as critics allege? Or is this another case of social media outrage racing ahead of facts? Let’s break it all down—calmly, clearly, and with context.
Understanding the Simone Biles Dog Ear Cropping Controversy
What Sparked the Backlash Against Simone Biles?
The uproar began after Simone Biles shared photos of her Doberman puppy on social media. Eagle-eyed followers quickly noticed the dog’s cropped ears—a cosmetic alteration that immediately raised red flags among animal welfare advocates.
Within hours, criticism poured in. Activist groups and fans alike accused Biles of endorsing a procedure they describe as “excruciatingly painful” and medically unnecessary.
Why Animal Rights Groups Are So Vocal
Animal rights organizations have long campaigned against cosmetic procedures performed on pets. For them, celebrity influence matters. When someone with Simone Biles’ platform appears to normalize ear cropping, critics argue it sends the wrong message to millions of followers.
To them, this isn’t just about one dog—it’s about setting cultural norms.
What Is Dog Ear Cropping, Really?
The Procedure Explained in Simple Terms
Ear cropping is a surgical procedure where part of a dog’s ear flap is removed to make the ears stand upright. It’s typically done on puppies between 6 and 12 weeks old and requires anesthesia, stitches, and weeks of aftercare.
Sounds intense? Many would say so.
Is Ear Cropping Medically Necessary?
Here’s the key point: in most cases, no. The American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) states that ear cropping is primarily cosmetic and opposes the procedure when done solely for appearance.
Some breeders argue it prevents ear infections, but scientific evidence supporting that claim is thin at best.
Why Ear Cropping Is Considered ‘Excruciatingly Painful’
The Physical Pain Factor
Despite anesthesia during surgery, dogs experience post-operative pain, swelling, and discomfort. Puppies often have their ears taped or bandaged for weeks to train them to stand—adding prolonged stress to healing tissue.
Imagine wearing a tight bandage on a healing wound for weeks. Not pleasant, right?
Psychological Stress on Animals
Beyond physical pain, animal behavior experts highlight emotional stress. Puppies endure separation, restricted movement, and unfamiliar sensations during a critical developmental stage.
That’s why critics label the procedure as not just painful—but cruel.
Simone Biles’ Role: Accusation vs. Intention
Did Simone Biles Personally Choose Ear Cropping?
This is where nuance matters. Simone Biles has not publicly stated that she personally requested the ear cropping. In many cases, breeders crop ears before puppies are adopted.
That distinction is crucial—but often lost in viral outrage.
What Simone Biles Has (and Hasn’t) Said
As of now, Biles has not issued a detailed public statement addressing the accusations directly. Her silence has fueled speculation, but it’s also consistent with her past approach—choosing mental well-being over online battles.
Is silence guilt? Or simply self-preservation? That depends on who you ask.
The Power—and Pitfalls—of Celebrity Pet Ownership
Why Famous Figures Face Higher Standards
Celebrities live under a microscope. When they post a photo, it’s not just personal—it’s performative. Fans copy hairstyles, workouts, and yes, even pet choices.
That’s why activists argue Simone Biles has a responsibility to model humane behavior.
When Social Media Becomes a Courtroom
Platforms like X and Instagram turn public opinion into a digital jury. Accusations go viral faster than explanations. Context gets buried. Emotions take the wheel.
In cases like this, nuance doesn’t trend—but outrage does.
Animal Rights Groups vs. Cultural Norms
Why Ear Cropping Is Still Legal in the U.S.
Despite growing opposition, ear cropping remains legal in many parts of the United States. Certain breed standards—especially for Dobermans and Boxers—still promote the look.
In contrast, countries like the UK, Australia, and much of Europe have banned the practice outright.
A Tradition That’s Rapidly Losing Support
Public opinion is shifting fast. What once seemed “normal” now feels outdated. Similar to declawing cats or tail docking, ear cropping is increasingly seen as unnecessary and unethical.
The Simone Biles controversy may be another turning point.
The Internet’s Reaction: Divided and Emotional
Supporters Defend Simone Biles
Many fans rushed to Biles’ defense, pointing out that:
-
The procedure may have happened before adoption
-
She has a long history of compassion and advocacy
-
One photo doesn’t define her character
To them, the backlash feels excessive—borderline bullying.
Critics Demand Accountability
On the other side, activists argue intent doesn’t erase impact. Even unintentional endorsement, they say, reinforces harmful norms.
Their message is simple: celebrities must do better.
The Bigger Conversation About Ethical Pet Care
Why This Debate Matters Beyond Simone Biles
Strip away the celebrity angle, and you’re left with a deeper issue: how humans treat animals for aesthetics.
This controversy has sparked thousands of conversations about ethical breeding, responsible ownership, and outdated standards.
Education Over Cancellation
Some animal advocates are urging a shift in approach. Instead of “canceling” public figures, they want education, dialogue, and reform.
Because real change doesn’t come from outrage alone—it comes from understanding.
Lessons for Pet Owners Everywhere
What This Means for Future Dog Owners
If you’re thinking about adopting a dog, this controversy offers a valuable takeaway:
-
Ask breeders questions
-
Avoid cosmetic procedures
-
Choose compassion over appearance
Your dog doesn’t care how their ears look. They care how they’re treated.
How Social Media Shapes Ethical Awareness
Like it or not, viral moments shape norms. Today it’s Simone Biles. Tomorrow, it could be anyone.
The silver lining? These conversations are pushing society toward more humane standards.
Conclusion: A Champion in a Complicated Moment
Simone Biles remains an Olympic legend, mental health advocate, and global role model. This controversy doesn’t erase her achievements—but it does highlight the growing expectations placed on public figures in an evolving ethical landscape.
Whether she intentionally supported ear cropping or unknowingly adopted a dog that had already undergone the procedure, one thing is clear: the conversation around animal welfare is louder than ever.
And maybe that’s not a bad thing.
