Simone Biles, a 7-time Olympic gold medalist, recently came into the spotlight when she faced backlash over an alleged blog post that ‘mocked’ conservative activist Charlie Kirk’s death. Later on, it turned out that the viral claim was fake. Kirk, the 31-year-old founder of Turning Point USA, was killed at a Utah Valley University event on September 10. Over the years, Charlie Kirk had made headlines on several occasions regarding his comments on Simone Biles. At times, his controversial remarks have even drawn strong reactions from fans. Here’s taking a look at some of them: Know what all Charlie Kirk said about Simone Biles
Biles and the 2020 Tokyo Olympics
The first big controversy was in July 2021 after Biles withdrew from some events at the COVID-19 delayed 2020 Tokyo Olympics. Biles cited mental health and the “twisties”, a condition where gymnasts suddenly lose control of their bodies, making routines dangerous, according to Snopes. On his The Charlie Kirk Show, Kirk criticized Biles for stepping back. He said he did not know what she had been through personally, including her past experiences with sexual abuse by former US Olympic gymnastics doctor Larry Nassar. Despite that, Kirk called her “selfish”, “weak”, “immature”, “a shame to the country”, “a sociopath” and “a disgrace”.
The internet loves a good feud—especially when it involves a sports icon and a controversial political commentator. Recently, Simone Biles, the most decorated gymnast in history, and Charlie Kirk, a conservative activist, found themselves at the center of a storm of viral rumors. Social media lit up with claims, counterclaims, memes, and heated debates. But what’s the actual truth? Let’s break it all down.
The Internet’s Obsession With Viral Feuds
We live in an age where arguments online can spread faster than wildfire. A single tweet or video clip can fuel outrage, inspire memes, and dominate trending charts. The Simone Biles vs. Charlie Kirk row is the perfect example of how quickly a narrative can spin out of control—even when the facts are fuzzy.
Who Is Simone Biles?
Before diving into the controversy, let’s rewind. Simone Biles isn’t just any athlete. She’s a four-time Olympic gold medalist, widely regarded as one of the greatest gymnasts of all time. Beyond her athleticism, she’s become a powerful voice for mental health, resilience, and self-advocacy.
Who Is Charlie Kirk?
Charlie Kirk is the founder of Turning Point USA, a conservative advocacy group. Known for his sharp criticism of mainstream culture, sports figures, and celebrities, Kirk thrives on sparking debates that quickly divide opinions.
What Sparked the Rumors?
The rumors began when clips circulated online of Kirk criticizing athletes who withdrew from competitions citing mental health struggles. Many assumed he was directly targeting Simone Biles after her decision to step back from events during the Tokyo 2020 Olympics. Memes and viral posts painted it as a personal attack, igniting a cultural clash.
Fact vs. Fiction: Did Charlie Kirk Attack Simone Biles?
Here’s the truth: Charlie Kirk did criticize athletes stepping away from competition for mental health reasons, but whether it was a direct attack on Simone Biles is debated. Critics say his comments were indirectly aimed at her since she was the most high-profile athlete to do so. Supporters argue he was making a broader cultural point.
Simone Biles’ Response: Silence Speaks Volumes
Interestingly, Simone Biles didn’t launch into a fiery rebuttal. Instead, she let her actions and advocacy do the talking. By continuing to champion mental health awareness and winning more medals after her return, she showed strength in ways words alone couldn’t.
Why This Feud Went Viral
Why did this story blow up so much? Simple—because it sits at the intersection of sports, politics, and mental health. Three hot-button topics that always spark passionate conversations online. Add in social media algorithms amplifying outrage, and you’ve got a recipe for virality.
The Role of Social Media in Fueling the Fire
Platforms like Twitter, TikTok, and Instagram thrive on snippets taken out of context. A 20-second video clip of Charlie Kirk can be framed as a direct insult to Simone Biles, even if the full context paints a different picture. Social media thrives on drama, not nuance.
How Fans Reacted
Simone Biles’ fans rushed to her defense, praising her bravery and slamming Kirk for what they saw as insensitivity. Meanwhile, Kirk’s supporters doubled down, framing him as “telling the hard truth.” The clash only intensified, splitting the internet into two camps.
Mental Health in Sports: The Bigger Conversation
Beyond the noise of social media, there’s a more important discussion happening here. Simone Biles opened the door for athletes to prioritize mental well-being. Kirk’s criticism, fair or not, highlights how society is still divided on whether mental health deserves the same weight as physical injuries in competitive sports.
The Power of Narrative: Hero vs. Villain
Media loves a good hero-and-villain story. Simone Biles was cast as the courageous athlete standing up for her mental health, while Charlie Kirk became the harsh critic unwilling to empathize. In reality, the truth lies somewhere in between—but nuance rarely goes viral.
Rumor vs. Reality: Sorting the Facts
-
Rumor: Charlie Kirk personally attacked Simone Biles.
-
Reality: He criticized athletes withdrawing for mental health reasons; Biles’ situation was heavily implied but not named.
-
Rumor: Simone Biles clapped back with a direct response.
-
Reality: She didn’t respond directly to Kirk, focusing instead on her career and advocacy.
The Lesson We Can All Learn
The Biles-Kirk row teaches us something about today’s culture: people love quick takes, but they rarely dig for full context. It’s a reminder to pause, fact-check, and not take every viral rumor at face value.
Why Simone Biles Still Wins in the End
Even without addressing the drama head-on, Simone Biles walked away from this situation stronger. She kept her focus, continued to inspire millions, and elevated the conversation about athlete mental health on the global stage.
The Future of Athlete Advocacy
If anything, this controversy will only strengthen the push for mental health recognition in sports. Simone Biles’ courage has already paved the way for athletes across disciplines to speak up. The Kirk criticism? Just background noise in the bigger picture.
Conclusion
The Simone Biles vs. Charlie Kirk row was less about two individuals and more about the cultural fault lines in society today. Viral rumors exaggerated the feud, but at its core, it was a debate about mental health, sports, and values. While Kirk’s criticism drew fire, Simone Biles’ resilience and silence spoke louder than words. In the long run, she remains the winner—not just in medals, but in sparking a much-needed global conversation.
